← All editorials

April 15, 2025·3 min read

Hair Care Hype: Unmasking the Origins of Your Favourite Brands

Moroccanoil isn't from Morocco. Amika quietly stopped disclosing its Israeli manufacturing locations after BDS pressure. Procter & Gamble reinvests $2B annually into Israeli R&D. The disclosures, named.

Hair Care Hype: Unmasking the Origins of Your Favourite Brands

A brand's name and its actual manufacturing geography are routinely uncoupled. Three documented cases in the hair-care category where the consumer-facing branding implies one origin and the operational reality is another.

Moroccanoil — branding implies Morocco

Moroccanoil hair-treatment product range
Moroccanoil — brand identity built around Moroccan argan oil heritage; over 80% of production based in Israel per Electronic Intifada reporting.

The brand identity rests on Moroccan argan-oil heritage. The manufacturing reality is different. Electronic Intifada's reporting documented Moroccanoil's principal production facilities as Israel-based, totalling over 80% of production volume. The "Moroccan" identity is a marketing position, not a manufacturing reality.

The Morocco-of-origin claim does appear in the brand's terms of service in technical form, but the front-of-pack branding doesn't make the operational reality readily visible.

Amika — quiet change in disclosure

Amika colourful product packaging
Amika — Brooklyn-headquartered but Israel-manufactured per the brand's previously-disclosed supply-chain documentation; manufacturing-location disclosure was removed from product packaging after BDS-movement attention.

Brooklyn-headquartered, Israel-manufactured per Conscious Bunny's review of the brand's previously-disclosed supply-chain documentation. The brand previously listed all manufacturing plants — including Israeli sites — on packaging and on the website. After the BDS movement directed attention at the brand, the published disclosure was rolled back: manufacturing-location detail was removed from bottle copy and reduced to "United States" framing on the public-facing website.

This is the more telling case of the three: the disclosure didn't change because the manufacturing changed. The disclosure changed because the attention pattern changed.

Procter & Gamble — the upstream investment

Procter & Gamble hair-care brand portfolio
Procter & Gamble hair-care portfolio — Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Herbal Essences, Rejoice; ~$84B total annual revenue with $2B annual R&D reinvestment in Israel per Forbes.

P&G's hair-care portfolio includes Head & Shoulders, Pantene, Herbal Essences, and Rejoice per the company's investor disclosures. The financial scale:

What honest brand-origin disclosure looks like

Brand-origin transparency comparison illustration
Brand-origin transparency: country named at the city level, manufacturing facilities disclosed, supplier chain published — not implied by trademark name.

The honest disclosure baseline:

  • Country of manufacture named at the city or region level, not at the "designed in / made in" level that the modifier obscures.
  • Parent company named explicitly on the product page or panel.
  • Manufacturing-site list published and stable — not adjusted for marketing optics.

For consumer-side reading: the parent-company line on a personal-care product carries information that the trademark name does not. Reading the parent — Procter & Gamble, Unilever, L'Oréal, Estée Lauder, Coty, Henkel, Kao — is the consumer-side test.

For adjacent reading, see our piece on the L'Oréal corporate record specifically, our look at North American cosmetic-regulation gaps, and our piece on label-engineering patterns more broadly.

First appeared in Salaaz Weekly Sustenance on April 15, 2025. read the original.

More reading

Adjacent editorials.