← All editorials

July 29, 2025·4 min read

The Culpable Beauty Industry: L'Oréal and the Profits of Oppression

L'Oréal's $200B market cap sits on a documented corporate record — animal testing, mica child labour, the founder's wartime collaboration, and current operations in occupied Palestinian territory.

L'Oréal's market capitalisation sits at approximately $200 billion. The corporate record that capitalisation rests on spans almost a century and carries several patterns worth documenting independently.

Animal testing — the protocol

Cosmetic animal-testing is the older of the documented patterns. The standard test protocols include:

Draize test laboratory equipment
Draize-test laboratory environment — the standard cosmetic-testing protocol on animal subjects; multiple jurisdictions have moved to ban the practice with the EU leading the regulatory transition.

The EU banned cosmetic animal testing in 2013. The US, Canada, and several major Asian markets have not — though Canada's 2023 Food and Drugs Act amendment moved partially in the direction. L'Oréal continues animal testing where required by jurisdiction (most notably for mainland-China market entry), per the company's own published policy.

Mica — child labour in the supply chain

Mica is the mineral that delivers shimmer in eyeshadow, blush, lipstick, and many highlighting products. The supply chain has a well-documented problem. A 2019 SOMO and Terre des Hommes Netherlands joint investigation documented approximately 62% of mica workers in Madagascar's mining regions are under 18, with the Indian Jharkhand mining region carrying parallel child-labour patterns at scale. China is a primary intermediary processor for mica entering global cosmetic supply chains.

Mica mineral mining illustration
Mica mineral — the shimmer ingredient in eyeshadow, blush, and highlighter; documented child-labour patterns in Madagascar and Jharkhand region supply chains.

The founder's wartime record

A separate piece of the corporate inheritance traces to Eugène Schueller, the L'Oréal founder, and is on the record through TIME magazine and Business Insider reporting:

Eugène Schueller authored book cover
Eugène Schueller's 1941 book *La révolution de l'économie* — documented by TIME magazine as carrying explicit pro-fascist economic argumentation.

Current-period operations

Beyond the legacy record, recent corporate disclosures and BDS-movement documentation cover several current-period concerns:

  • L'Oréal awarded a $100,000 research grant to a scientist at Israel's Weizmann Institute, which has documented military-research programmes in nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons development.
  • L'Oréal sources Dead Sea mineral ingredients via concessions on territory under documented Israeli occupation per UN classification.
  • L'Oréal's Israeli operations occupy site contested as the ethnically-cleansed Palestinian village of al-Mujaydil.

The L'Oréal sub-brand portfolio includes Garnier, Maybelline, Urban Decay, NYX, L'Oréal Paris, La Roche-Posay, CeraVe, Lancôme, Yves Saint Laurent, and many others.

Alternatives with disclosed corporate records

Alternative cosmetic brand product range
Three alternative brand categories — K-beauty, Huda Beauty, SimiHaze Beauty — with disclosed corporate-record profiles and cruelty-free certification.

  • K-beauty. South Korea banned cosmetic animal-testing in 2018; the K-beauty sector includes a broad product range with disclosed cruelty-free certification.
  • Huda Beauty. Founded and led by Huda Kattan, who has publicly aligned with Palestinian agricultural preservation initiatives; certified cruelty-free.
  • SimiHaze Beauty. Founded by Simi and Haze Khadra; cruelty-free certification; the founders have publicly used the platform on the Gaza humanitarian situation.

More affordable cruelty-free options include Colourpop, Milani, and LA Girl.

What follows

Reading the corporate parent on cosmetic products carries information the front-of-pack does not. The L'Oréal portfolio is broad enough that the consumer-side test is to look up the parent before purchase — the brand-level cruelty-free claim doesn't extend up the ownership tree.

For adjacent reading, see our piece on cosmetic-regulation gaps in North America, our look at fragrance chemistry, and our piece on hair-care brand ownership patterns.

First appeared in Salaaz Weekly Sustenance on July 29, 2025. read the original.